The Landmark Corporation ignoring DTI?
I have a copy of a letter identified as from the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) addressed to the Store Manager at the Landmark Ayala Center, Makati City. Said letter contains the words: “This refers to the complaint . . . relative to the security . . . concerns in your building. We are referring the herein attached complaint for your appropriate action. Action on the above subject may be communicated directly to the
above complainant .” I am said complainant. Up to April 2, 2011, nobody from said corporation has communicated with me regarding said complaint.

complaint vs. Manila Health Department endorsed by Office of the Secretary, Department of Justice.
Will Manila Mayor Lim continue to not reply to complainant?
The above is based on the contents of a letter titled “2nd Indorsement" identified as from a source identified as Victorio Mario A. Dimagiba Director Bureau of Trade Regulation and Consumer Protection 2F Trade and Industry Building, 301 Senator Gil J. Puyat Avenue, 1200 Makati City, and dated 24 March 2011, Said letter contained the words: “referred to Mayor
Alfredo S. Lim, City of Manila . . . for appropriate action the attached complaint of Mr. Macario Silva endorsed by the Office of the Secretary,Department of Justice, Padre Faura, Manila, regarding his complaints against your good self and Vice Mayor Moreno
on the non-response/action on the complaint of Mr. Silva filed against the Manila Health Department, as the subject matter falls within the jurisdiction of your office. Information on the action taken thereon may be directly coordinated to above-mentioned complainant”. A 1st Endorsement from the DOJ was identified as an attachment to said
letter.

Complaint vs. Manila Mayor Alfredo S. Lim and Globe Telecom store
Rule IX Article 11 of Republic Act No. 9257 contains the following statement: "It shall
be the responsibility of the municipality/city through the Mayor to require all establishments covered by the Act to prominently display posters, stickers, and
and other notices that will generate public awareness of the rights and privileges of senior citizens and to ensure that the provisions of the Act are implemented to its fullest." Based on the above statement, it is the responsibility of Manila through Manila Mayor Alfredo S. Lim to require all establishments in Manila covered by the Act to
prominently display posters, stickers, and other notices that will generate public
awareness of the rights and privileges of senior citizens and to ensure that the provisions of the Act are implemented to its fullest." While I was in the Globe Telecom store at January 22, 2011, said establishment, which was covered by said Act, did not prominently display said posters, etc. "SEC. 4. Privileges for the Senior Citizens. – The senior citizens shall be entitled to the following:
13. provision of express lanes for senior citizens in all commercial and government establishments; in the absence thereof, priority shall be given to them."
While I was in Globe Telecom store at Robinsons Place Manila on January 22, 2011, there was no provision of express lanes for senior citizens in said store and priority was not given to me by an employee of said store even after I showed said employee my senior citizens ID card. I have a sales invoice issued to me at said store on said date.

DILG Secretary Jesse Robredo subject of complaint filed with Presidential Management Service
Evidence is a letter from a “Atty. Maria Charina Buena-Dy Po Director IV Technical Staff Department of Justice Manila” addressed to the Chief, Presidential Management Service (PMS), Office of the President, Malacanang, Manila. Said letter is
addressed to the Chief, Presidential Management Service (PMS), Office of the President, Malacanang, Manila. Said letter is dated 15 March 2011. Said letter bears the words: “. . . referred to the Chief, Presidential Management Service (PMS), Office of the President,
Malacanang, Manila, for whatever action may be appropriate in the premises, the attached letter dated 12 February 2011, of M. Silva, requesting an update on the status of the complaint filed against Secretary Jesse Robredo . . .”

Evidence vs. SMART BROADBAND, INC.
Cyberzone/4th Floor
SM Manila
Concepcion St.
Manila

On Mar 12, 2011, said store sold to me a USB modem for use with a computer using Windows 7 operating system. Up to April 3, 2011, I have not been able to use said modem in a notebook computer using Windows 7 operating system to access the internet. I have a cash invoice issued on March 12, 2011 by said store.