Advisory vs. D'24k Photo Inc.
which was at 713 R. Hidalgo St., Quiapo, Manila. On 8/11/11, an employee, at said store, issued to me sales invoice No. 32336 wherein the handwriting below the words “Received the above goods in good order and condition” is not mine, the customer. Because of said handwriting, I can no longer complain if I found something wrong with the product sold to me.

Advisory re the Landmark at Ayala Center, Makati.
I recently went to said building. The guard at an entrance to said building didn't inspect well my luggage, which is large enough to contain grenades.I went to different parts of said building but in the customer areas of said store,there was no visible express lane for senior citizens. I believe the management of the Landmark violated a provision of the Senior Citizens Act of 2010.

While I was in said building, I bought food from what was identified as Chow King store.I have proof of purchase.While I was at said store, there was no visible express lane for senior citizens and no visible required prominent display of posters, stickers, etc. regarding the privileges of senior citizens.I believe the management of said store violated an implementing rule/regulation of said law.
privileges of senior citizens.I believe the management of said store violated an implementing rule/regulation of said law.

While I was at said Chow King store, I saw an employee at what was identified as the kitchen of said fast food store. Said employee was identified as: Jose. He toucheemployee was identified as: Jose. He touched a ball pen, etc, and then with said bare hands, touched plates used for customers foods. So the germs from said ball pen could transfer to said plates. An employee at said restaurant who served me didn't have a visible health certificate at the upper left of the clothing he/she was
wearing.


From the Landmark building, I went to the Park Square 1 building at Ayala Center, Makati. The guard at an entrance to said building: did not inspect my luggage; didn't use a metal detector to scan said luggage; didn't use a bomb sniffing dog to
smell said luggage. Said luggage is big enough to contain grenades. I have proof that I purchased a product from a store in said Park Square 1.
From said Park Square 1, I went to SM building at Ayala Center Makati.The guard at an entrance to said building: did not inspect my luggage; didn't use a metal detector to scan said luggage; didn't use a bomb sniffing dog to smell said luggage. Said luggage is big enough to contain grenades.I purchased food from a store identified as Tokyo Tokyo in the food court at said building.I have proof of purchase. A person at said store who was handling food didn't have displayed a health certificate.From the food court I went to what was identified as SM Supermarket.I went to different parts of said store but, in the customer area of said store, there was no required prominent display of poster, stickers, etc. regarding
the privileges of senior citizens. I believe the management of said store violated implementing rule/regulation of the Seniorthe privileges of senior citizens. I believe the management of said store violated implementing rule/regulation of the Senior Citizens Act of 2011.

in the food court at said building.I have proof of purchase. A person at said store who was handling food didn't have displayed
a health certificate.From the food court I went to what was identified as SM Supermarket.I went to different parts of said
store but, in the customer area of said store, there was no required prominent display of poster, stickers, etc. regarding
the privileges of senior citizens. I believe the management of said store violated implementing rule/regulation of the Senior
Citizens Act of 2010.





Evidence vs. the Mandaluyong post office:
The registry return receipt for registered letter No. 8-5-6 addressed to the the Building Administrator of SM Megamall does not bear on the back of said receipt the postmark of the date of the delivery of said registered letter.